<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &lt;facedesk&gt;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://codegumbo.com/index.php/2009/10/08/facedesk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://codegumbo.com/index.php/2009/10/08/facedesk/</link>
	<description>Laissez Les Bon Code Roulez!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:51:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arlene</title>
		<link>http://codegumbo.com/index.php/2009/10/08/facedesk/comment-page-1/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Arlene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 22:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codegumbo.com/index.php/2009/10/08/facedesk/#comment-193</guid>
		<description>Tell us how you REALLY feel. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell us how you REALLY feel. <img src='http://codegumbo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stuart</title>
		<link>http://codegumbo.com/index.php/2009/10/08/facedesk/comment-page-1/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 02:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codegumbo.com/index.php/2009/10/08/facedesk/#comment-188</guid>
		<description>Boy, you were quick!  I was still cleaning up the code after it posted funny, and you&#039;ve already replied :)  

It just amazes me the number of posts that I&#039;ve seen on there that the author thinks they need to do a cursor, and even more amazing is that people offer them cursor-based solutions.  I understand when dealing with legacy code that you have to get dirty sometimes, but this is a prime question looking for a set-based solution.

Sheesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy, you were quick!  I was still cleaning up the code after it posted funny, and you&#8217;ve already replied <img src='http://codegumbo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   </p>
<p>It just amazes me the number of posts that I&#8217;ve seen on there that the author thinks they need to do a cursor, and even more amazing is that people offer them cursor-based solutions.  I understand when dealing with legacy code that you have to get dirty sometimes, but this is a prime question looking for a set-based solution.</p>
<p>Sheesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K. Brian Kelley</title>
		<link>http://codegumbo.com/index.php/2009/10/08/facedesk/comment-page-1/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>K. Brian Kelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 02:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codegumbo.com/index.php/2009/10/08/facedesk/#comment-187</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s simple: they haven&#039;t made the paradigm shift.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s simple: they haven&#8217;t made the paradigm shift.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

